Reports & audit

Find the gaps before the auditor does.

Run the audit before the audit. A scored dry run against a sample of your controls, findings with the evidence behind them, and remediation that turns into owned work rather than a PDF.

What you get

Output that survives a challenge.

Every number on these pages can be traced back to the record that produced it.

Audit simulation

A dry run of the certification audit. An AI lead auditor evaluates a sample of controls against your documents and risks, and progress is committed per control so the bar reflects real work.

Findings you can act on

Each control comes back with a status, a severity, what evidence was found, what the gap is and a recommendation — with the reasoning and a confidence attached.

A score, and the delta

Passed controls count fully, partial ones count half, and not-applicable controls are excluded. The result is compared with your last completed run for the same framework.

Remediation that becomes work

Turning a finding into a remediation task writes a real entry in the risk register with an owner, rather than leaving it in a report nobody opens again.

Document review

Grade a document you already have against ISO 42001, ISO 27001 or the EU AI Act: a coverage matrix per article, findings by severity, and the specific wording changes that would close the gaps.

Readiness reporting

Control coverage, regulatory exposure and audit readiness across the organisation, computed from your own rows and scoped to the framework you are looking at.

Audit simulation

A scored dry run, control by control.

Choose a framework and a sample size. Each control is evaluated against the documents and risks actually linked to it, and the score is the weighted result across the sample.

Illustration of an audit simulation result: an overall score with per-control findings and their severities.
Audit simulatorISO 42001

Audit score

62

8 controls sampled

Passed4

Partial2

Failed2

Findings

A.6.2 Impact assessmentPARTIAL

Assessment predates the latest model change

A.9.2 Human oversightPASSED

3 evidence items, all within validity

A.7.4 Data qualityFAILED

No evidence linked to the requirement

Document review

Grade the policy you already have.

Upload a document and it is read against the framework it is meant to satisfy: which articles it covers, which it only partly covers, which it misses, and the three wording changes that would do most to close the gap.

Where no model is reachable the review falls back to a keyword baseline and says so plainly, rather than returning a confident-looking score it did not earn.

Next / evaluate the platform

Bring your frameworks.
See the operating system.

We will walk through the platform against your own governance and compliance needs, and what getting to audit-ready would take.